It's over a year since we first played Settlers via Skype with our son Tim (who is in the UK). Since then, we've played several such games with him, and have gradually changed the technology; Facetime is now the usual method, and there is always some discussion about what microphone and cameras to use.
But we've never played a five-person game this way. With our other son Daniel and his wife Becky staying, Tim suggested we try. Richard and Daniel set up a proper microphone, balanced on a stand in the middle of us so that Tim would be able to hear us all, and we got started...
Daniel took these first two pictures.. while we were doing the initial set-up, Becky played with her remaining pieces to make some little stick figures:
Then I took the camera, so the board looks a little turned around. Here were our starting places - Richard was red, as usual, and I was orange. Tim played white, Becky blue and Daniel brown:
Of course it's quite hard to see all the numbers in a photo of the bigger board. We all had fairly evenly distributed numbers and resources at the start. It wasn't long before Becky built a city, and Richard managed two of them fairly quickly:
I was struggling through lack of clay, and thus was last at this stage, still on two points. Richard was in the lead with five.
Becky was adapting her stick figures to suit her remaining pieces, and produced this, possibly a cyberman of some kind:
I traded and traded, and at last managed to build a few streets and settlements, and even gained a possible clay resource, although as it was on a 3 it wasn't all that frequent:
So suddenly I was sharing the lead with Tim and Richard - all on five points - while Daniel had four, and Becky was still on three.
Here's a photo showing Tim thinking about his move, with the little Settlers picture at the side being the image of what he was seeing:
I managed my first city, then decided to expand a little more in the hope of more clay - and someone pointed out that I had the longest street. So, bizarrely, I was in the lead with eight points. But only just. Daniel was building cities as fast as he could as well as expanding, and was on seven. Tim, playing his usual ore-wheat strategy, had three cities and thus six points. Richard, who for some reason was not getting cards, was still on five, and Becky had four:
I managed another city, and thus nine points. Tim built, in quick succession, a settlement and then an upgrade to a city, so had eight points. Then Daniel not only expanded but took the longest street, so now he was in the lead, with ten points.
Becky and Richard were trailing a little with six each. But since Becky had won each of the last three games we had played, she didn't mind!
Then Tim played a third knight, giving him the largest army, and sharing the lead with Daniel, also on ten points. Daniel then took his turn, built another settlement... and showed a victory point development card. So Daniel was the winner:
Here's how the board looked at the end:
Daniel won with 12 points, but Tim also had a victory point so he was close behind with 11. And the rest of us had eight points each... Becky had a victory point card too. It was a good game.
No comments:
Post a Comment