Rivers and Knights of Catan...? (for two)

Richard's favourite game is Cities and Knights, so, if we don't have any guests, we play a two-person game of this at least once a week. We've got to the stage that we can play it even if we're tired - no longer does it seem the horrendously complicated game it did at first.

But just occasionally we want a slight variation. So I suggested we attempt one of the Cities and Barbarians variants, with Cities and Knights. Richard decided to start with the first scenario in the booklet, the one that uses the River of Catan - last played quite some time ago.

So we got out three boxes, and set up the game, complete with the rivers on the board in place of a few hexes, and the bridges to allow us to cross the rivers (at the cost of two brick one one wood). Oh, and the coins, which can be earned from building next to rivers.  Plus all the Cities and Knights paraphernalia:

I rolled to go first, which I prefer not to do in the two-person game; had I gone second, I would have taken exactly the places Richard (red) took with his two settlements, giving all five resources and six different numbers. As it was, remembering that it was Cities and Knights, and that I always like to collect the 'books' resource, I started on the 8-wood hex, hoping to upgrade to a city as soon as possible. I did also take into account that clay (bricks) looked as if they might be scarce, so was pleased to start on the best clay resource on the board. 

I then placed my city on the next best wood hex, which also gave access to sheep. 

Since we had, inevitably, both built at least some of our starting pieces next to one of the rivers, we both had some coins. We had decided that, with only two of us, we would ignore the 'wealthy' and 'poor settler' cards; this meant that neither of us had any incentive to hang onto coins, so we both used them to buy what we needed (two coins buys one card in the Rivers of Catan scenario) to get our first settlements: 

This meant that the robber and the event die came into play after just two rounds, and the game progressed rapidly. Clay was not in such short supply as we expected, so I fortified my city quickly with two clay cards - that enabled me to have 11 in my hand before the robber would strike, rather than the usual 9 which we allow in the two-person game. 

We both built an extra city fairly quickly, then only just managed to have sufficient knights to defend us when the pirate ship arrived on the shores of Catan for the first time:

Richard had seven points by this stage, and I was lagging behind with five.

We had the same number of knights, so each took a resource card of our choice. We always choose the green 'building' ones if we can, as they tend to be the most useful. Richard's was the 'alchemist' that allowed him to switch two numbers of his choice (excluding 6, 8, 2 or 12). So he exchanged the 5 on wheat (which I had) with the 11 on ore (which he had): 

My green resource card was even more useful - a street-building one, which enabled me to place two streets, something I had been struggling to do.  I had a free city fortification too, so used that, giving me 13 cards allowable before the robber could steal from me. 

A few moves later, since Richard had the resources, and wanted the ore harbour, he built his first bridge: 

That gave him the longest street, but then I managed to build two more streets - an 11 was rolled, giving me plenty of clay - so I took the card from him: 

Then I picked up an alchemist card, meaning I too could switch two numbers. I took the 5 which Richard had placed on ore, and changed it with the 11 on clay, which would theoretically benefit us both:

I say 'theoretically', because as it happened, 11s were rolled rather more often than 5s in this game!

Richard collected the merchant card and using it on wood, of which he had an abundance, right before the pirate struck for the second time:

Although I had the longest street, I only nine points on the board (making 11 in total). Richard had ten on the board, plus the merchant, giving him also 11. So we were neck and neck at this point (not that we actually counted points while playing). 

However, Richard was doing well with the cloth resource cards, and managed to get to metropolis level: 

Little did I know his dastardly plan, which was to build another bridge, and take the longest street card back from me: 

We had both, by this stage, built all four cities.  He also had four settlements on the board, giving him 12 building points, plus two for the metropolis, two for the longest street, and one extra for the merchant. He only needed one more point... and managed it, building his final settlement:

So he was the resounding winner, and I had, simply, 12 points from what I had built. 

I didn't build a single bridge, and neither of us had any victory points at all. 

A most efficient layout on a six-person Catan game

A few weeks ago, we were playing a six-person Settlers of Catan game, with our usual friends and one friend's parents. A six-player game can, of course, lead to rather an over-crowded board, but as we progressed through the game, it seemed that nobody had run out of building spots early on.

It wasn't until about half-way through that I suddenly realised what a remarkably efficient layout we had managed to produce:

Quite by accident, none of our settlements was directly opposite another on any hex. So, theoretically, we had the maximum possible number of building spots. Blue, green and orange had all run out of new spots by this stage, but each had managed six. Red had six already, and one more. And there were four remaining spots which could be accessed by either white or brown.

As it happened, the game did not continue for many more rounds after that. Here's the final board:

I think it was Richard (red) who won, with the largest army (or perhaps two victory points) as well as ten points on the board.

Settlers of Catan for two of us

Monday evening, and nothing planned... so out came the Catan box for another two-player game. Orange pieces for me, red for Richard, as usual. It would be very confusing if we ever decided to change colours!

Richard rolled the higher number, so - according to our two-player Settlers house rules - he would place his first settlement, then I would place two (taking resources cards for one of them) then he would place two more (taking resource cards for both) and I would then place my final one, taking resource cards for that too. We allow nine in a hand before the robber can attack, and two or three robber-free rounds at the beginning anyway.

Richard said that he was going to use 'my' strategy of starting on the best hex for whichever resource was likely to be scarcest. As it happened, there weren't any obviously lacking resources on this board, but I thought clay and wood would be the most problematical. So I expected Richard to start on either the 4-clay or the 9-wood; most likely, I thought, the useful 5-9-10 combination with sheep, wood and clay respectively.

However, to my surprise, he didn't take either of my chosen spots - instead he opted for the 3-4-8 with wood (on three only) and two ore. That meant that I could place my first two settlements on the two spots I had marked out as the best ones, which gave me five good numbers and access to all five resources.

Richard then took the 5-9-10 with two wheat and wood, and - after some consideration - the 3-4-8 with two clay and a sheep. He liked that spot, which was undoubtedly the best remaining one for clay, but didn't like the fact that it had exactly the same number combination as his first settlement.

As I looked for a spot to place my final settlement, my main aim was access to an 8, since I already had 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10. Since I like having good ore access, I opted for the 8-10-desert hex with ore on 8 and wood on 10. The wood harbour looked rather attractive and convenient too.


Clay and wood were not lacking in the early stages of the game, so we placed streets, and Richard bought a few development cards too. 9s were not rolled, which was a bit annoying since it meant that I could not build a settlement, having no wheat - and nor could I buy any cards. I had to trade four ore, at one point, for one wheat in order to take the sheep harbour, and then trade heavily again for my second settlement.

Then suddenly we rolled three nines in a row, and, with plentiful ore, I was able to build my first city.

However, I had made a strategic error in not securing a spot on the wood harbour; I placed my first two streets next to the other two I had started with, leaving the way open for Richard, who was collecting a lot of wood and clay, to race past me for the wood harbour:


I was ahead at this point in the game (six points, while Richard had four) but he had already played a knight, and had two or three other hidden development cards. As with the last game we played, we decided that the robber would be controlled by whoever rolled a seven (rather than whoever was behind in points) and also that the robber would always steal from the bank - rather than the other player - a resource matching whatever hex he was placed on.

I really wanted a spot on that 5-wheat hex, since wheat was my weak point in this game. Richard had in fact placed his initial settlements as if he were using the 'ore-wheat' strategy, and was beginning, as a result, to get ahead. So I played him at his game, storing up clay and wood until I could push past him to the 2-5 wheat spot on the coast. In doing so, I took the longest street card... for about twenty seconds. Richard then built more streets and took it from me, for the rest of the game.


So I still had six points, while he now had nine. He had also played two knights, so was likely to achieve the 'largest army' too.

And, indeed, that's what happened. We both continued building on just about every turn - in fact Richard reached 16 points before either of us had realised it, and so won the game with 17 points, including both the largest army and the longest street:


I did have one victory point, so I lost with 11 rather than just the ten points I had on the board.

Three-person Settlers of Catan with Sheila

Shortly before we finished our three-person Settlers game with Tim, our friend Sheila arrived. It was only just nine o'clock when we had finished it, so we decided we'd play a game with her - Tim wanted to do something else at that stage.

Sheila (with brown pieces) rolled to go first. She likes to use the wood-clay strategy, so she opted for the 3-8-10 intersection with sheep, clay and wood. I was second, again. It didn't look as if any of the resources would be in particularly short supply in this game, so I took the other obviously good place: 5-9-10 on ore, wood, and wheat.

It wasn't such a nice board as in the previous game; I don't know what I'd have done in Richard's shoes. He did manage to get access to all five resources with reasonable numbers, although he wasn't too happy at having two 6s and no 8. I needed clay and sheep, and in the basic Catan game will always sacrifice sheep (so to speak!) when there is a necessary choice. So I built on the coastal 4-8 with wheat and clay as my second choice.

Sheila then had a difficult decision. Ore is crucial, and there was nowhere to build on one of the good ore hexes. So after some pondering, she took the 5-10 coastal intersection with ore and wood. She wasn't too happy about having only four numbers, and no wheat; but the only real alternative was the 4-6-11 on three wheat, which would have left her lacking ore.


There was plenty of clay and wood in this game, so we all managed to build the streets we needed early on without much difficulty. I decided to aim for the 8-sheep hex, taking the ore harbour along the way (not that it was particularly useful to me). Richard aimed for the same 8-sheep hex, gaining access to the 4-sheep hex at the same time. He also built an early city, and then headed out to a 3:1 harbour.

He said later on that he decided to try and get access to all the possible numbers if he could. Even by this stage of the game, fairly early, he had managed to get 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10, and was clearly heading for a 10 and 11.


We thought that Richard was just in the lead at this stage, with five points, then we realised he had the longest street. So in fact he had seven. I had four, and Sheila still had two.

I'm not quite sure how it happened, but there seemed to be no stopping Richard in this game. I suppose it was due to his having so many numbers available - all he lacked was a 2. That meant that he picked up a lot of resources; when he was worried about getting too many, he bought a development card, but he frequently found himself able to build too. His longest street got longer, and he took the wheat harbour. All I managed was one upgrade to a city and one more street in that time, while Sheila had very bad luck with the roll of the dice, and didn't manage any building at all.


So Richard was zooming ahead. He had ten points, including the longest street. I had five points, Sheila had two.

The end was not far away. Richard had already played two knights, so when his next turn came around he played the third. That gave him the largest army, and two more points, which made him the runaway winner:


The whole game had only lasted about 45 minutes.

Settlers of Catan in the evening

The same group that met for a Catan game last Thursday evening gathered once more. This time, John and Sarah played separately but Richard and Tim formed a team. They play very differently from each other, so it was interesting to know how they would work together.

They rolled to go first. Playing Richard's usual red pieces, they had some discussion about starting but opted for the good numbers of 5, 8 and 9 on sheep, ore and clay respectively.

Sheila was second, with her usual brown pieces. She opted for the other obvious place: 4-6-9 on ore, wood and clay. That would probably have been my starting spot of choice, had I played first. The numbers were not quite so good as Tim and Richard's choice, but wood is generally more useful than sheep. Then again.. it didn't look as if there would be a lot of sheep in the game, if numbers were rolled as expected.

I was third. With the two prime locations taken, I decided to opt for numbers rather than three resources. So, playing orange as usual, I took the 5-8-9 on two wheat and wood. Of course I had a faint hope that I might be able to access the wheat harbour.. but it seemed pretty unlikely that it would still be available.

As it happened, it wasn't until John (playing white) got to place his settlements that the rather nice 4-6-10 (two ore and wood) intersection was taken. He went for numbers rather than resources, it seemed, since he started without either sheep or wheat.

Jörn (blue) and Sarah (green) played in between John and me; both of them were able to access all five resources, at least in theory, with their placements, and also had a reasonable selection of numbers. So by the time I got to place again, there wasn't much available. I decided that it was most important to have ore, and I really wanted a 6 if possible. So I opted for the coastal 6-4 spot, which gave me yet more wheat in addition to a useful ore place. Possibly I should have placed my street heading inland since I had little hope of getting to the wood harbour before Sarah did, but I knew I had plenty of space for expansion in the wheat section near my first settlement.


By the end, Tim and Richard probably had the best selection of numbers, although I was quite pleased with mine too. They were lacking wheat; I was lacking both sheep and clay.

With plentiful ore and wheat, I managed to build my first two cities fairly easily. Sarah took the wood harbour, so I knew I would have to do any expansion via my other settlement. Clay was somewhat at a premium, but others wanted wheat so I was able to trade, and built a couple of settlements around the 8-wheat hex. John expanded towards the wheat section too, since that was a resource he lacked; in doing so, he was the first to take the longest street card.

I was actually in the lead at this point in the game, with six points. This seemed rather surprising, since the lack of clay was holding me back. I had considered expanding out towards the 5-clay hex, but only ever managed one set of street resources at a time. If I had built one, or even two streets, I could pretty much guarantee that Jörn would have then built one of his to block me.


Sarah, who also had good access to ore and wheat, had also built two cities and had five points. John also had five, with the longest street card, as did Tim and Richard. Jörn and Sheila each had four. It was still very even.

I continued being lucky with rolls and trading, and was able to expand further inland to take a double-wood slot next to the desert. Although, unfortunately, I then kept forgetting to take the relevant wood resources when a 6 was rolled! I was handed the longest street card, which put me more firmly in the lead with eleven points. All I needed was one more city, and I would have won... although I'm pretty sure I did not realise this at the time!


Tim and Richard had built all their cities by this stage - despite still lacking wheat - and had nine points. Sheila had seven, and everyone else had six.

My hope of victory diminished when Jörn joined up his sections of street, and thus took the longest street card with nobody able to take it from him.

Finally I had the resources for three streets in my hand, so I built out towards the 5-clay hex. Not that clay was going to do me much good at this stage - but it was another building spot. Sheila had taken the ore-wheat one which I'd hoped to take near my main expansions so this was my last possible place to build.


So, once again, it could almost have been anybody's game. Tim and Richard were now in the lead with ten points, but Jörn and I were both right behind with nine points each. Sarah and Sheila each had eight, and John had seven. John still had three possible building spots; I had one, Richard and Tim shared one possibility with John; I had the one on the clay which I technically shared with Jörn, but he needed to build some cities first, and I almost had the cards in my hand for that settlement...

Then it was Richard and Tim's turn. I picked up wood, which was the last resource I needed to built my settlement on their building phase.

Except that there wasn't one. They played a third knight card, thus taking the largest army, and another two points.

Once again, Tim had won. That's three wins in the three games we have played since he arrived here last Thursday. According to my statistics on the side of this blog, he's now won 10 out of the 20 games which he's played with us since I started recording them at the end of last year.


Still, nobody was completely trounced. Jörn had ten points, Sarah had eight, and the rest of us each had nine.

Five-person Settlers of Catan

After an enjoyable meal with our friends, the children went to bed and the rest of us started another game of Settlers.

John rolled to go first. He was playing with the white pieces, and with the entire board to choose from, opted for a coastal spot. It was certainly the best place for wood and clay (10 and 8 respectively) and gave him the ore harbour too... but not a spot I would even have considered when playing first, particularly since there weren't any particularly nice places nearby to aim for.

Richard (red) was second, and chose the exact spot I would have liked. Ore was evidently going to be in somewhat short supply in this game, so clearly the 6-ore hex was worth grabbing. He took it, along with a useful 5 on wood, and 10 on wheat.

I was third, with my usual orange pieces. So I took the other spot that had three resources and good numbers - actually slightly better numbers than Richard's, statistically speaking (5-8-9) but with sheep rather than the more useful ore. Sheila said she would have taken the one next to it (with the 4 on clay rather than the 9 on sheep) - but I no longer worry about having both clay and wood at the start of the game, and 9 is a slightly more useful number than 4, in general.

Sheila (brown) was fourth; since there were no places left with three good numbers and three different resources, she opted for the 5-6-9 intersection with two wood and a sheep. That's what I'd have taken in her position. Jörn (blue) played last; with the advantage of being able to place both settlements at the same time, he opted for two reasonable spots, giving him access to all five resources, and five useful numbers (3, 6, 8, 9 and 10) as well as a 12 on clay.

On the way back around the table, we all attempted to get hold of the numbers and/or resources we were lacking. I could not get hold of both ore and clay; so although I did consider the 3-6 coastal hex with two ore, it was quite a crowded place already, and I prefer room to manoevre without too many people trying to get the same spots. So I shrugged mentally, and chose three other reasonable numbers, giving me clay on 5, and two more sheep hexes. I realised that there was no way I could get to a sheep harbour, and in retrospect I think the place with two ore would have been more useful - but I didn't go for it.


The most surprising second placement was John's, who built simply on the 6-ore hex by the sea. He didn't even take the 3-6 intersection which I had considered. He said his strategy was to take harbours (and, indeed, the spot he chose was right on the wood harbour) but it gave him only three numbers in all, and not a whole lot of scope for expansion into other useful numbers.

So we started the game, and unsurprisingly I collected quite a few sheep. 3s were rolled a few times, giving access to ore, so I was able to trade for it and buy one or two cards. Mostly I concentrated on expanding to start new settlements, and succeeded in getting a spot on ore, albeit with an 11. Richard had hoped for the nearby spot with a 10 on wheat - actually I'd quite have liked that one too, but thought it better to secure the one I could easily take rather than push further away and risk losing the spot altogether.

Richard and Jörn each managed a city reasonably early in the game, John started building roads in order to get to some useful building spots, and Sheila fairly quickly achieved the longest street:


That put her in the lead with six points, but Jörn was close behind with five; Richard had four; John and I each had three. With five players on the larger size Catan board, there's usually a fair amount of room so we weren't really fighting over building spots too much.

Having said that, Richard - who didn't find the intersection with a 12 and two desert hexes too appealing - did make an attempt to build right across the board to grab a place where I actually built, on the 4-11-8 intersection with two clay and wheat. However, in doing so, he gained - by quite a margin - the longest street card:


Although he couldn't extend it any further, the only person who could possibly challenge him was John - and he still had quite a way to go. So Richard now had nine points, including three cities and the longest street. He could still upgrade to another city, he still had the unattractive potential building spot by two desert hexes, and he had played two knight cards... meaning that he would most likely also take the largest army. Richard was in a strong position.

Jörn, meanwhile, had seven points, Sheila had six, I had five, and John had four.

In the next round, I finally succeeded in getting my first city. Sheila played a wood monopoly, which gained her quite a few cards and enabled her to use her useful wood harbour; she was then able to build another settlement, and a city. Jörn and John each managed another settlement too.

But Richard was unbeatable. On his turn, he built another settlement, played a third knight (thus gaining the largest army) and also displayed a hidden victory point card. He was the clear winner, with thirteen points in all.


Sheila did say afterwards that she debated playing a third knight card before Richard did, thus prolonging the game a little - but could not resist playing the monopoly on wood instead, since there was rather a lot of wood to be gained from it. I suspect Richard would have won sooner or later, anyway.

Four person Cities and Knights of Catan

For the first time, the four of us were at home for an evening together. It was four weeks since the last time Richard and I played Cities and Knights, and we realised we had never played it with four people.

Richard (playing red pieces) rolled highest, and placed first. I didn't think his choice - the 3-4-8 intersection near the top of the board - was all that great. Becky (blue) took what I thought was the best choice from the city-improvement perspective: a 5-9-10 intersection on sheep, ore and wood respectively. All she needed to do was to upgrade to a city, and she would then have a good chance of collecting all three Catan commodities.

Daniel (brown) took another great spot from the number perspective, including a 6 on clay, and also a 4 on wheat. I had already spotted that wheat was likely to be in serious shortage in this game. So when it was my turn to place both my settlement and my city, I chose some reasonable numbers that included that 4-wheat, and access to all five resources. I particularly liked the idea that any time an 8 was rolled, I would collect a street.

I then forgot to take a photo until we'd played our first round, and built some streets. Richard had even bought and activated his first knight. I remembered just as Becky was placing the first new settlement of the game:


My initial plan was to head for the useful 9-10-5 intersection with two sheep and an ore. Unfortunately, Daniel had the same idea. And when he realised that I would get there before he could, he built a settlement on the 2-5-9 intersection, which gave him a building spot (albeit not as useful) and effectively blocked me from the one I wanted. But I shrugged, and built another street, thinking I would take the 9-10-11 intersection with sheep, ore and wheat.

Alas for my plans. Richard built in that direction, and built a settlement on the adjacent 3-10-11... so I was stymied again.

So I decided on my next move I would head towards the coast from my city, towards the 3:1 harbour... only to find that Daniel had picked up a street-building progress card, enabling him to stop me in my tracks from that one too. He picked up the longest street at the same time, putting him in the lead with six points already:


Richard had five points, Becky had four, and I was still on my initial three... and beginning to run out of building spots already.

It wasn't long before the barbarians made their first landing to Catan. Between us, we had sufficient activated knights to stop them: two for Richard, two for Becky, and two for me.


So we each picked up a progress card of our choice since nobody was the outright Defender of Catan.

I had at least managed to build one settlement by that stage, on the wheat harbour. Not that I was getting a lot of wheat (indeed, I don't think I used it for trading in the entire game), but it was a building spot.

Since I was having such a hard time building settlements, I concentrated for a while on city improvements, and before too long was able to gain Metropolis level with wood. Rather a lot of 8s had been rolled, and other people seemed happy to trade with me.


And the barbarians attacked again. This time, Richard had the most knight power, so gained an extra victory point as Defender of Catan.


So Richard was in the lead with 9 points. Daniel right behind with 8 (including the longest street) and I had 7, including my metropolis. Becky, who had picked up a victory point progress card, had 6.. and kept just missing the opportunity to build a settlement, despite having plenty of building spots. She simply wasn't getting wheat, nor many sheep (since 5s came up only rarely). She had managed to build her city in the useful spot with three potential commodities, but none of those numbers were rolled all that frequently.

By the next barbarian attack, I had managed to build another settlement and upgrade it to a city. I'd also built more streets - hoping for (and succeeding in) one more building spot on the 2 - and Daniel pointed out that my longest street was now longer than his. So that gave me two more points.

Richard and Daniel shared the most knights at this next attack, so no more victory points were awarded; but they both had another progress card to pick up.


Suddenly I realised that I was in the lead with 12 points. Richard, with his one Defender of Catan victory point, was close behind with 11. Daniel had 8, and Becky was still on 6. The booklet said that we should play to 13 points, so we decided that 15 was a reasonable number to aim for.

The next excitement was that Richard managed metropolis level on the cloth commodity improvements. So he now had 13 points. And Daniel extended his roads, giving him back the longest street card. He had control of the merchant, too, so he had 11 points. I was back to 10, and Becky - who had had a sudden spate of success in building - had 8.


I was expecting the game to go on for a while longer... then Richard built some more streets. Daniel's longest street had eight pieces, and Richard's had 9. So he had two more points, making him the winner with 15. And then he showed that he had the merchant card, so he took that as well, meaning he had in fact won with 16 points.


It was a pretty strong victory, I was second with 10 points, Becky was close behind with 9, and Daniel was just behind again with 8.

As we were talking about the game and starting to clear away, Daniel took the camera. He switched to sepia to take this rather nice picture of Richard:


.. and a black-and-white picture of the robber:


... and this, showing both the merchant (artistically out of focus, close to the camera) and the robber in the distance:

Another six-person Settlers of Catan

After our enjoyable foray into Catan on Thursday, our friends invited us to dinner and another game on Saturday. Most of the children went to bed, but Helen was still up, so while the others were setting up I explained a few more of the complexities of Catan to her:


Then we placed our initial settlements. Jörn (blue) was first, and chose a very nice spot with good access to both wood and clay. Richard (red) took another similar location. I (orange) then decided to go for the best numbers I could find amongst the remaining intersections, despite knowing that ore was likely to be a fairly scarce resource. I was pleased to be able to take a 10-ore slot on the second placement, though Daniel (green) had taken the best spot as far as ore was concerned.


Play was fairly slow at first, with Richard and I being the first two to build settlements although Jörn did well with streets, and headed out towards a useful clay spot:


It wasn't long before cities started appearing. 11s were rolled a little more than would be expected, statistically speaking, which helped. By this point in the game, Becky (white) had 6 points including two cities, and was in the lead again. Daniel and Richard each had 4 points; the rest of us were on 3:


It seemed that Becky was on a roll. She soon increased her points to 7 with a third city, while all the rest of us had 4:


Of course, this meant that the robber was placed on Becky at every opportunity. And Jörn, who had such good access to wood and clay, continued to build roads and soon took the longest street card:


Daniel pointed out to Becky that she could join her sections of streets, which would ensure that I didn't gain the card (and she might)... so with several suitable cards in her hand, she built a few more streets. While Jörn had the longest street card, they were in the joint lead with 7 points each; Daniel still had 4 and the rest of us each had 5.


It wasn't long before Becky joined her two street sections, took the card, and was well in the lead again with 9 points. She only had one building spot left, but there wasn't much competition for it. The rest of us, other than Daniel, now had 6 points; Daniel still had 4.


Poor Daniel was thwarted at every point. First Becky had taken one of his building spots; now I hoarded cards until I could build three more streets, then built out to block another one for him. I didn't feel too bad about it, since he'd stopped me from taking the longest street by suggesting that Becky do so!


The board was beginning to fill up. Becky played her final settlement, giving her 10 points. However Sheila had also been building, and was close behind with 9. Richard had 7, although he had bought quite a few development cards at the start of the game, and had played a couple of knights so was evidently aiming for the largest army. Jörn and I each had 6 points, Daniel had 5.


Jörn made an attempt at taking the longest street card from Becky, but she was able to keep it since she had no wastage. She built her last city, so there was nothing for her to do other than buy cards and hope for a victory point - which several of us were doing by this stage in the game. Sheila now had 10 points, as did Richard (including the largest army). Jörn had managed to build some more settlements - not on very useful places, but they still gave him points. So he had 9 by this stage. I had 7, Daniel had 5.


To our surprise, we ran out of development cards. None of us could remember that having happened before. It meant that there was no chance for some of us to win. Richard had planned to buy two more cards on his turn, with some trading... however, he then realised that in fact he could build a final city, so that he was the winner with 12 points.


Several of us did have one victory point card, including Sheila - so she and Becky were in joint second place with 11 points each.